Notifications
Clear all

New study shows that chewing directly affects jawbone structure

11 Posts
6 Users
4 Reactions
4,415 Views
 Pame
(@pame)
Posts: 172
Topic starter
 

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2019/05/190531100544.htm

 

"Although previous studies found that the hardness of food is correlated with jaw structure, it was not yet clear whether masticatory force could directly impact bone structure. In this study, the researchers uncovered new information about the cellular and molecular changes that enable bone to adapt to changes in mechanical stress. [...] Our data indicate that masticatory force can prompt changes in facial structure by modulating the function of cells that regulate bone reconstruction".

So we now know for a fact that chewing will change bone structure at any age. This study also supports the idea of mewing as it shows facial bone structure will adapt to stress applied. However the study dosen't say anything about how exactly the bone structure alters as it adapts. The term "jawbone" is used which Im assuming is referring to the mandible?

What changes in particular to the bone structure of the lower jaw can be expected from chewing? Im guessing ramus lengthening and jaw widening are the most likely ones, but what other changes could occur? I personally haven't experienced any improvement to the crowding in my lower jaw despite a quite extreme increase in masticatory force and stress being placed on the mandible in the past year.

 


 
Posted : 01/06/2019 10:52 am
(@polholmes)
Posts: 74
 

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-40463-3

 

This is a link to the entire journal 


 
Posted : 01/06/2019 9:10 pm
Pame and Pame reacted
 Pame
(@pame)
Posts: 172
Topic starter
 

I only see them mentioning a shortening of the mandibular ramus taking place when incorporating a hard diet. If anything the increased masticatory stress should lead to a lengthening of the ramus as a result of inclination of the mandibular plane?


 
Posted : 02/06/2019 8:05 am
(@roflcopters)
Posts: 185
 
Posted by: Pame

I only see them mentioning a shortening of the mandibular ramus taking place when incorporating a hard diet. If anything the increased masticatory stress should lead to a lengthening of the ramus as a result of inclination of the mandibular plane?

It may widen it at the level of the masseters tho, I didnt read the whole thing but bone deposition isn't something that's that str8 forward.

Even esthetically speaking in humans, a longer ramus isn't ne essarily what looks or is the best thing. Bone thickness probably is the best look as it sorta shortens the face and makes it wider. 


 
Posted : 02/06/2019 9:45 am
(@bogdar)
Posts: 81
 

Thank you for the find!

Regarding the ramus, it depends on what they call the ramus? If you are degenerate thus with a high gonial angle, the ramus is round and could be said "longer" than the same ramus but pointing straight down with a sharp 90° angle to the mandible.

I don't know, I feel like my ramus lengthened since the beginning of my journey, long ramus are seen in well developped persons and short/non existing ramuses are seen in poor developped people. Furthermore (what a coincidence) it is a beautiful feature. 

How to make sense out of it? 


 
Posted : 02/06/2019 10:47 am
(@bogdar)
Posts: 81
 

Well, figure two and three on results tab says it all. 

The "shortening of the ramus" is more of a shortening of the total height of the mandible, i.e more compact one and thus reducing total face height. Moreover they note a developement of the "masseters ridge", which I remember Astrosky mentionned in one of his videos; after starting chewing hard gums he developped a "bony process" on the ramus, pointing out. Just my opinion but I think this ridge is particularly beautiful and add thickness and solidity to the face. 

 

It is welcomed to add that "Although large masticatory force may be harmful on the condyle and result in the shortening of the ramus, there was no erosion on the surface of the condyle of mice fed with HD (Fig. 4d,e). No obvious differences in the cartilage and subchondral bone were observed (Fig. 4e), indicating that the increased mastication by the HD affects the mandibular bone morphology without damaging the cartilage in the condyle."


 
Posted : 02/06/2019 11:05 am
(@mr-mewing)
Posts: 323
 

I can agree with this because a few months ago my ramus was like really lengthen downwards and less forwards no my ramus slightly decreased in downwards length and increased in forwards length, and my prognathic jaw got less so this means my jaw is a little more upright which gives the mandibular plane a more upwards look.


 
Posted : 02/06/2019 1:16 pm
 Pame
(@pame)
Posts: 172
Topic starter
 

@bogdar Wouldn't a shortening of the mandible mean a reduction in posterior third height? Which really isn't a positive for males. Whats desirable is a reduction in midface height. 

 

Are you able to find the Astro video you were referring to? In regards to the bony process on the ramus, Im guessing you mean something like this?

IMG 1679
fullsizeoutput 4b2

I find it strange that theres no specific mentioning of mandibular widening occurring. Would be very strange if that did not take place at all.


 
Posted : 02/06/2019 1:48 pm
(@bogdar)
Posts: 81
 
Posted by: Pame

@bogdar Wouldn't a shortening of the mandible mean a reduction in posterior third height? Which really isn't a positive for males. Whats desirable is a reduction in midface height. 

 

Are you able to find the Astro video you were referring to? In regards to the bony process on the ramus, Im guessing you mean something like this?

IMG 1679
fullsizeoutput 4b2

I find it strange that theres no specific mentioning of mandibular widening occurring. Would be very strange if that did not take place at all.

I think so, I don't know exactly how it would affect the looking tho. If there's something that reduces face's height I take it. In addition my mandible and every "high gonialed" mandibles go too far down, and I wonder how much it would help by "reducing mandible height". 

 

Regarding the "masseteric ridge" I think as they called it, what you are showing me are the masseters themselves. Eventho the ridge is associated with strong masseters thus when it is presents you also have good masseters, it is not what is on the photos.

I'm talking about what you can see on this picture, the "angle" part, just where the masseter is. It is the down part of the ramus, where a little "ridge" can be created.

For the video I honestly don't remember, and my computer is lagging too much for me to quick research, I only remember that he was talking about chewing. It was some months ago


 
Posted : 02/06/2019 2:16 pm
(@gotti)
Posts: 121
 

Very interesting! Thanks for the find, and for having such a great discussion.


 
Posted : 02/06/2019 5:08 pm
 Pame
(@pame)
Posts: 172
Topic starter
 

I also saw them mentioning that chewing released IGF-1 in the bone cells in the mandible. However Im wondering if this IGF-1 can only be used in these cells, or if its usable for the entire body? There was another user here who mentioned he gained significant muscle mass (without exercising), grew taller and even experienced penile enlargement supposedly as a result of a chewing muscle strengthening routine. 


 
Posted : 03/06/2019 2:35 am

Leave a reply

Author Name

Author Email

Title *

 
Preview 0 Revisions Saved

Skull and Jaw Correction

Free Classes

Join hundreds who are Tensegrity Mewing, enhancing the good results of mewing and reversing damage. Free Newsletter and Classes

Your email is safe with us, we don’t spam