On a scale of 1-10 with 1- being very recessed and 10- being completely fine
You're not recessed at all but could definitely improve from mewing / open-mouth chewing
Looks like normal development. But have you measured the mew line?
Your development is normal as in average, but not normal as in ideal. Based on your overbite, subtle dorsal hump, gonial angle and philtrum projection I would say you are at 6. Numerical rating is of course highly subjective, so here is a rough approximate of your ideal profile for your own comparison:
Amazing morph. Hope op can achieve that profile with mewing
You're not recessed at all but could definitely improve from mewing / open-mouth chewing
What is open mouth chewing? Is it the same as gum chewing/tongue chewing?
Thanks for the great morph Progress. I thought that I was recessed because of my gonial angle and lack of jawline, long face, and lack of forward growth. Can someone show me a person with lots of recession in their face.
Your development is normal as in average, but not normal as in ideal. Based on your overbite, subtle dorsal hump, gonial angle and philtrum projection I would say you are at 6. Numerical rating is of course highly subjective, so here is a rough approximate of your ideal profile for your own comparison:
You transformed him from retrognathism to prognathism.
IMO you don't have "normal" development, at all. You have classical features of a class II malocclusion: chin back from your maxilla, nose seems not in the good dimensions compared to the face, skin under chin a bit too relaxed, lack of compacity, weak cheekline, burried ramus but I guess a not that good angle.
IMO again, on the scale of class II features, 10 being the most recessed you are like 5 or so. I don't think your ideal profile by Progress is actually your ideal profile. With all respects @Progress.
Your development is normal as in average, but not normal as in ideal. Based on your overbite, subtle dorsal hump, gonial angle and philtrum projection I would say you are at 6. Numerical rating is of course highly subjective, so here is a rough approximate of your ideal profile for your own comparison:
You transformed him from retrognathism to prognathism.
What makes you think so?
Your development is normal as in average, but not normal as in ideal. Based on your overbite, subtle dorsal hump, gonial angle and philtrum projection I would say you are at 6. Numerical rating is of course highly subjective, so here is a rough approximate of your ideal profile for your own comparison:
You transformed him from retrognathism to prognathism.
What makes you think so?
As I said, cheekline is still missing. Moreover the chin is too big and give him a prognath look. Intuitively midface and lowface ratio are not good. Except for the cheekline I think your morph on midface is quite accurate and pretty good, but not for the lower face.
I'm not saying I could do a better morph tho.
Your development is normal as in average, but not normal as in ideal. Based on your overbite, subtle dorsal hump, gonial angle and philtrum projection I would say you are at 6. Numerical rating is of course highly subjective, so here is a rough approximate of your ideal profile for your own comparison:
You transformed him from retrognathism to prognathism.
What makes you think so?
As I said, cheekline is still missing. Moreover the chin is too big and give him a prognath look. Intuitively midface and lowface ratio are not good. Except for the cheekline I think your morph on midface is quite accurate and pretty good, but not for the lower face.
I'm not saying I could do a better morph tho.
From what I understand, prognathism is defined by mandibular dental arch that has advanced beyond the maxillary arch, essentially being the same thing as underbite / class III malocclusion. A strong telltale of prognathism is usually excessively pouting lower lip, which is something that is not present in the picture.
Now that you pointed it out though, I agree that his chin should end up with less vertical height and that his lower third:middle third ratio is a bit off. I may have made his nose slightly too short too.
In reality, his face would grow in a manner that would be difficult to capture without extensive editing. By this edit I was attempting to give a general picture of the extent of improvements that could possibly be available to him. Considering this, perhaps it was misleading to call it "ideal" profile.
Skull and Jaw Correction
Join hundreds who are Tensegrity Mewing, enhancing the good results of mewing and reversing damage. Free Newsletter and Classes
Your email is safe with us, we don’t spam